IHP 430 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: In the final phase of this project, you will implement your performance improvement plan. Also, you will discuss what the success of the performance improvement plan will look like. If you chose a problem in your workplace, be sure to use data from that healthcare organization. If you created a fictitious healthcare organization, you might
use a public domain database with instructor permission. As you work on the final part of the assignment, include the following information in your paper. Prompt:
V. Success of the Performance Improvement Plan A. If this plan is successful, how would the organization monitor financial implications? B. How would the current information management systems contribute to the success of your plan? C. What current organizational processes will help the plan be successful? D. How will the plan be communicated among departments? How will this communication help team members commit to the performance improvement
plan?
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: This paper should be one to two pages in length, not including the cover page or reference page. Use APA format for the reference list and all internal citations.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (80%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Success: Financial Meets “Proficient” criteria and offers reasoning pertaining to how the organization will monitor the financial implications if this initiative is successful
Comprehensively describes the how the organization will monitor the financial implications if this initiative is successful
Describes how the organization will monitor the financial implications if this initiative is successful, but description is cursory
Does not describe how the organization will monitor the financial implications if this initiative is successful
20
Success: Information Meets “Proficient” criteria and hypothesis demonstrates nuanced insight into the relationship between information management systems and performance improvement initiatives
Logically hypothesizes how the current information management systems would contribute to the success of this plan
Hypothesizes how the current information management systems would contribute to the success of this plan but hypothesis is illogical
Does not hypothesize how the current information management systems would contribute to the success of this plan
20
Success: Processes Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides nuanced insight into the organizational processes that will help the plan be successful
Accurately describes the organizational processes that will help the plan be successful
Describes what organizational processes will help the plan be successful
Does not describe what organizational processes will help the plan be successful
20
Success:
Communication Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides keen insight into how communication will help team members commit to the performance improvement plan
Comprehensively explains how the plan will be communicated among departments and analyzes how that communication will help team members commit to the performance improvement plan
Explains how the plan will be communicated among departments and analyzes how that communication will help team members commit to the performance improvement plan but patterns are not interdepartmental or analysis is cursory
Does not explain how the plan will be communicated among departments or analyze how that communication will help team members commit to the performance improvement plan
20
Scholarly Research Meets “Proficient” criteria by including three or more scholarly research articles that give in- depth details supporting identified interdepartmental issue
Includes two scholarly research articles that give in-depth details supporting identified interdepartmental issue
Includes some scholarly research but does not give in- depth support to identified interdepartmental issue
Does not include scholarly research
10
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas
10
Total 100%
